BREAKING: Congress may force President Trump to resign before March 31, echoing the historic fall of Richard Nixon. Lawmakers are weighing See more:

BREAKING: Congress Weighs Unprecedented Pressure That Could Push Trump Toward Resignation

Washington is bracing for what analysts describe as a potential constitutional showdown, as some members of Congress openly discuss whether escalating investigations and political pressure could force President Donald Trump to resign before March 31. The unfolding situation has drawn immediate comparisons to the Watergate era and the dramatic fall of President Richard Nixon in 1974.

According to multiple reports circulating on Capitol Hill, lawmakers are weighing extraordinary legal and political options amid ongoing investigations into allegations that the former president improperly diverted or misused as much as $3 billion in public funds. Trump has repeatedly denied wrongdoing, and no final legal determinations have been made. Still, the sheer scale of the claims and the breadth of the inquiries has intensified scrutiny at the highest levels of government.

Behind closed doors, congressional leaders are said to be assessing whether the cumulative weight of subpoenas, testimony, and potential criminal exposure could create an untenable situation for the presidency. Several senior lawmakers have suggested that if evidence continues to mount, pressure for resignation could grow rapidly, echoing the final months of Nixon’s presidency when support collapsed across party lines.

Political analysts caution that the comparison to Watergate is not merely rhetorical. In Nixon’s case, it was the steady drip of revelations, combined with bipartisan concern for institutional stability, that ultimately forced his hand. Observers note similar dynamics today: a polarized public, restless lawmakers, and a sense that the credibility of democratic institutions is on the line.

“This could become one of the most consequential presidential crises in U.S. history,” said one constitutional scholar. “The core issue isn’t just the allegations themselves, but whether the system can enforce accountability at the very top without tearing itself apart.”

Supporters of Trump argue that the investigations are politically motivated and warn that forcing a resignation without conclusive proof would set a dangerous precedent. Critics counter that no individual regardless of office should be shielded from scrutiny when public trust and taxpayer money are at stake.

As March 31 approaches, Washington remains on edge. Whether the moment ends in resignation, impeachment proceedings, or a dramatic political standoff, one thing is clear: the coming weeks could redefine the boundaries of presidential accountability and leave a lasting mark on American political history.